Direct naar de inhoud
Safety & toxicologyDogCat

Raw feeding (BARF) in dogs and cats: risks and evidence

Raw feeding (BARF) in dogs and cats: risks of bacteria, nutritional imbalance and bone obstructions based on scientific evidence.

Reasonable evidenceOne or a few sound studies in the target species, but still limited or not independently replicated. Further research may change the conclusion.
Published: Last updated: Next review: 27 June 20272 min read

Short & honest

Raw food poses real risks to both the animal and the owner: bacterial contamination, nutritional deficiencies and bone obstructions are well documented. Evidence for health benefits is weak (grade B: reasonable evidence for harm, limited evidence for benefit).

Safety assessment: Risky

Veterinary review not yet completed

This page is awaiting review by a registered veterinary surgeon. Until then, treat the text as education based on the sources listed — not as a verified veterinary judgement.

What is BARF?

BARF stands for Biologically Appropriate Raw Food or Bones and Raw Food. The diet typically consists of raw muscle meat, organs, bones, optionally vegetables and sometimes dairy or eggs. Proponents state that it aligns with the evolutionary diet of dogs and cats. However, the scientific evidence for concrete health benefits is limited [2].

Microbiological risks

Raw pet food samples regularly contain pathogenic bacteria. Studies find Salmonella in 7–21% of tested samples; Listeria monocytogenes was found in up to 54% of investigated Dutch products — percentages that are significantly higher than in heat-processed feed [1][2].

Particularly concerning is the finding of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant E. coli in approximately 80% of Dutch raw feed samples [1]. This type of antibiotic resistance is a recognised public health problem.

Dogs and cats fed raw feed can excrete Salmonella asymptomatically in their faeces. The infection risk for household members is therefore real, particularly for children, the elderly, pregnant women and people with a weakened immune system [1][3].

Freezing reduces the parasite risk (e.g. Toxoplasma, Toxocara) at a temperature of −20 °C for at least 72 hours, but does not eliminate bacteria such as Salmonella and Listeria [2].

The AVMA actively discourages feeding non-heat-processed animal protein sources due to the pathogen risk for both the animal and the owner [3].

Nutritional imbalances

Both homemade and commercial BARF diets regularly show nutritional deficiencies in research [2]:

  • Calcium/phosphorus ratio — incorrect balance leads to bone mineralisation problems in young animals
  • Vitamin D, zinc and magnesium — deficiencies have been repeatedly reported
  • Hypervitaminosis A — excessive liver use can lead to chronic vitamin A poisoning
  • Growth disorders — abnormal bone mineralisation and joint complaints have been described in puppies and kittens on a long-term BARF diet

Formulating a diet that meets FEDIAF or AAFCO standards for all life stages is difficult to guarantee without specialised nutritional guidance.

Bone obstructions

Raw bones are responsible for 30–80% of oesophageal and gastric obstructions in dogs and cats [1]. This is an independent surgical risk factor, separate from infection risk. Even so-called 'soft' raw bones can cause splinters or become lodged in the gastrointestinal tract.

Risk groups

Risk groupPrimary danger
Puppies and kittensNutritional imbalance, bone deformities
Immunocompromised animalsSevere bacterial infection
Household members (children, elderly, pregnant women)Transmission of Salmonella, Listeria, resistant bacteria
Animals given bonesObstruction, perforation

Consideration

'Natural' does not automatically mean 'safe'. The documented risks of raw feed — bacterial contamination, nutritional imbalances and bone obstructions — are measurable and real [1][2][3]. Anyone who nevertheless chooses raw feed is advised to discuss this with a vet specialising in nutrition and to apply strict hygiene protocols during preparation and serving.

Why this verdict?

The risks of BARF are supported by several observational studies and microbiological analyses, including Dutch-focused research on pathogens in commercial raw food products [1][2]. The studies are predominantly uncontrolled and the study populations are small, which makes direct causal claims difficult — hence grade B. Randomised controlled trials on long-term health outcomes are almost entirely lacking.

How we grade evidence →

Legal status (Netherlands)

No legal restrictions on feeding raw food to pets in the Netherlands, but AVMA guidelines and FEDIAF standards strongly advise against non-heat-treated animal protein sources without adequate nutritional guidance [3].

Sources

  1. [1] Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. Journal of Small Animal Practice / PMC, 2019. Narrative review doi:10.1111/jsap.13000
  2. [2] Current Evidence on Raw Meat Diets in Pets: A Natural Symbol, but a Nutritional Controversy. Animals (Basel) / PMC, 2025. Narrative review doi:10.3390/ani15030293
  3. [3] AVMA Policy: Raw or Undercooked Animal-Source Protein in Cat and Dog Diets. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). Guideline source ↗

Written by Redactie Diernatuur Wiki

Independent editorial team

An independent editorial team that gathers the literature, grades the evidence and writes according to the editorial charter. Sells nothing and has no commercial interests.

  • Works to a GRADE-style evidence rating
  • No commercial interests